Author Topic: Is the output of besim correct?  (Read 10972 times)

dongqing

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 8
  • Karma: +0/-0
Is the output of besim correct?
« on: June 02, 2019, 09:13:18 PM »
I found that Besim's output in centos6 and centos7 is different.

Here are the results of running test_besim_support.sh on centos6 and centos7.

centos 6.4
-----------------------------------------

?3&0&1079975569&500


* About to connect() to 192.168.221.71 port 81 (#0)
*   Trying 192.168.221.71... connected
* Connected to 192.168.221.71 (192.168.221.71) port 81 (#0)
> GET /fcgi-bin/besim_fcgi.fcgi?3&0&1079975569&500 HTTP/1.1
> User-Agent: curl/7.19.7 (x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) libcurl/7.19.7 NSS/3.13.6.0 zlib/1.2.3 libidn/1.18 libssh2/1.4.2
> Host: 192.168.221.71:81
> Accept: */*
>
< HTTP/1.1 200 OK
< Date: Mon, 03 Jun 2019 00:58:14 GMT
< Server: Apache/2.2.15 (CentOS)
< Cache-control: no-store
< Content-Length: 304
< Connection: close
< Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
<
<html>
<head><title>SPECweb2005 BESIM</title></head>
<body>
<p>SERVER_SOFTWARE = Apache/2.2.15 (CentOS)
<p>REMOTE_ADDR = 192.168.221.71
<p>SCRIPT_NAME = /fcgi-bin/besim_fcgi.fcgi
<p>QUERY_STRING = 3&0&1079975569&500
<pre>
0
DONE ResetDate = 20190602, Time=1079975569,Load=500,SL=11
</pre>
</body></html>
* Closing connection #0


centos 7.5
-----------------------------------------
?3&0&1079975569&500


^?ELF^B^A^A^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^B^@>^@^A^@^@^@½^O@^@^@^@^@^@@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@P£^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@@^@8^@   ^@@^@^]^@^\^@^F^@^@^@^E^@^@^@@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@@^@@^@^@^@^@^@@^@@^@^@^@^@^@ø^A^@^@^@^@^@^@ø^A^@^@^@^@^@^@^H^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^C^@^@^@^D^@^@^@8^B^@^@^@^@^@^@8^B@^@^@^@^@^@8^B@^@^@^@^@^@^\^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^\^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^A^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^A^@^@^@^E^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@@^@^@^@^@^@T<83>^@^@^@^@^@^@T<83>^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@ ^@^@^@^@^@^A^@^@^@^F^@^@^@ð<8d>^@^@^@^@^@^@ð<8d>`^@^@^@^@^@ð<8d>`^@^@^@^@^@0^T^@^@^@^@^@^@À^U^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@ ^@^@^@^@^@^B^@^@^@^F^@^@^@^H<8e>^@^@^@^@^@^@^H<8e>`^@^@^@^@^@^H<8e>`^@^@^@^@^@ð^A^@^@^@^@^@^@ð^A^@^@^@^@^@^@^H^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^D^@^@^@^D^@^@^@T^B^@^@^@^@^@^@T^B@^@^@^@^@^@T^B@^@^@^@^@^@D^@^@^@^@^@^@^@D^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^D^@^@^@^@^@^@^@Påtd^D^@^@^@¨s^@^@^@^@^@^@¨s@^@^@^@^@^@¨s@^@^@^@^@^@Ì^A^@^@^@^@^@^@Ì^A^@^@^@^@^@^@^D^@^@^@^@^@^@^@Qåtd^F^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^P^@^@^@^@^@^@^@Råtd^D^@^@^@ð<8d>^@^@^@^@^@^@ð<8d>`^@^@^@^@^@ð<8d>`^@^@^@^@^@^P^B^@^@^@^@^@^@^P^B^@^@^@^@^@^@^A^@^@^@^@^@^@^@/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2^@^D^@^@^@^P^@^@^@^A^@^@^@GNU^@^@^@^@^@^B^@^@^@^F^@^@^@ ^@^@^@^D^@^@^@^T^@^@^@^C^@^@^@GNU^@¼^Q¿¸<8c>^]WÝr0½><9b>^\ÁCþr¬]^C^@^@


RamyaMeruva

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 23
  • Karma: +1/-0
Re: Is the output of besim correct?
« Reply #1 on: June 04, 2019, 01:27:06 AM »
Is this what you're getting as output?  Can u attach the txt version of the same output?


?3&0&1079975569&500


^?ELF^B^A^A^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^B^@>^@^A^@^@^@½^O@^@^@^@^@^@@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@P£^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@@^@8^@   ^@@^@^]^@^\^@^F^@^@^@^E^@^@^@@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@@^@@^@^@^@^@^@@^@@^@^@^@^@^@ø^A^@^@^@^@^@^@ø^A^@^@^@^@^@^@^H^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^C^@^@^@^D^@^@^@8^B^@^@^@^@^@^@8^B@^@^@^@^@^@8^B@^@^@^@^@^@^\^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^\^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^A^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^A^@^@^@^E^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@@^@^@^@^@^@T<83>^@^@^@^@^@^@T<83>^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@ ^@^@^@^@^@^A^@^@^@^F^@^@^@ð<8d>^@^@^@^@^@^@ð<8d>`^@^@^@^@^@ð<8d>`^@^@^@^@^@0^T^@^@^@^@^@^@À^U^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@ ^@^@^@^@^@^B^@^@^@^F^@^@^@^H<8e>^@^@^@^@^@^@^H<8e>`^@^@^@^@^@^H<8e>`^@^@^@^@^@ð^A^@^@^@^@^@^@ð^A^@^@^@^@^@^@^H^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^D^@^@^@^D^@^@^@T^B^@^@^@^@^@^@T^B@^@^@^@^@^@T^B@^@^@^@^@^@D^@^@^@^@^@^@^@D^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^D^@^@^@^@^@^@^@Påtd^D^@^@^@¨s^@^@^@^@^@^@¨s@^@^@^@^@^@¨s@^@^@^@^@^@Ì^A^@^@^@^@^@^@Ì^A^@^@^@^@^@^@^D^@^@^@^@^@^@^@Qåtd^F^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^P^@^@^@^@^@^@^@Råtd^D^@^@^@ð<8d>^@^@^@^@^@^@ð<8d>`^@^@^@^@^@ð<8d>`^@^@^@^@^@^P^B^@^@^@^@^@^@^P^B^@^@^@^@^@^@^A^@^@^@^@^@^@^@/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2^@^D^@^@^@^P^@^@^@^A^@^@^@GNU^@^@^@^@^@^B^@^@^@^F^@^@^@ ^@^@^@^D^@^@^@^T^@^@^@^C^@^@^@GNU^@¼^Q¿¸<8c>^]WÝr0½><9b>^\ÁCþr¬]^C^@^@

SMF 2.

dongqing

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 8
  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Is the output of besim correct?
« Reply #2 on: June 05, 2019, 03:25:44 AM »
thanks for the reply
It's the reason for the fcgi binary library on aarch64

RamyaMeruva

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 23
  • Karma: +1/-0
Re: Is the output of besim correct?
« Reply #3 on: June 05, 2019, 04:48:20 PM »
Hi Dongqing,

Were u able to resolve all issues?

Thanks,
Ramya

dongqing

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 8
  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Is the output of besim correct?
« Reply #4 on: June 05, 2019, 08:59:55 PM »
Hi

i got a lot output like this in client

-> 2019-06-05 17:35:49:883 SPECweb_Support: [ERROR] STATE 5; Expected 113300 bytes appended to response but found 94500
-> 2019-06-05 17:35:49:883 SPECweb_Support: [ERROR] STATE 5; RESPONSE INVALID on GET /support/file.php?id=36332 HTTP/1.1
-> 2019-06-05 17:35:49:969 Connection: SocketTimeoutException waiting for end-of-header
-> 2019-06-05 17:35:49:969 SPECweb_Support: [ERROR] SocketTimeoutException encountered during run!
-> 2019-06-05 17:35:50:039 SPECweb_Support: [ERROR] Invalid title tag, expecting 'SPECweb2005: Support Category' but got 'SPECweb2005: Support Home' was found
-> 2019-06-05 17:35:50:040 SPECweb_Support: [ERROR] Expected 18 catalog listings, 10 found.
-> 2019-06-05 17:35:50:040 SPECweb_Support: [ERROR] STATE 2; Expected 27500 bytes appended to response but found 51700
-> 2019-06-05 17:35:50:040 SPECweb_Support: [ERROR] STATE 2; RESPONSE INVALID on GET /support/catalog.php?id=1795 HTTP/1.1
-> 2019-06-05 17:35:50:091 Connection: SocketTimeoutException waiting for end-of-header
-> 2019-06-05 17:35:50:092 SPECweb_Support: [ERROR] SocketTimeoutException encountered during run!
-> 2019-06-05 17:35:50:211 Connection: SocketTimeoutException waiting for end-of-header
-> 2019-06-05 17:35:50:212 SPECweb_Support: [ERROR] SocketTimeoutException encountered during run!
-> 2019-06-05 17:35:50:241 SPECweb_Support: [ERROR] Invalid title tag, expecting 'SPECweb2005: Support Product' but got 'SPECweb2005: Support Category 3737' was found
-> 2019-06-05 17:35:50:241 SPECweb_Support: [ERROR] Expected 60 optons, 0 found.
-> 2019-06-05 17:35:50:241 SPECweb_Support: [ERROR] STATE 3; Expected 52700 bytes appended to response but found 27500
-> 2019-06-05 17:35:50:242 SPECweb_Support: [ERROR] STATE 3; RESPONSE INVALID on GET /support/product.php?id=1517 HTTP/1.1
-> 2019-06-05 17:35:50:304 SPECweb_Support: [ERROR] Invalid title tag, expecting 'SPECweb2005: Support Category' but got 'SPECweb2005: Support Home' was found

I refer to the method of this url https://www.spec.org/virt_sc2013/docs/SPECvirt_TechnicalSupport.html
it's not the reason for "fs.file-max = 500000"

I think i need to change the php test code in specweb

RamyaMeruva

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 23
  • Karma: +1/-0
Re: Is the output of besim correct?
« Reply #5 on: June 12, 2019, 08:09:48 PM »
Hi Dongqing,

Default protocol is SSLv3 which is no longer supported by many webservers. Which one are u using? Can u try using TLS?

Thanks,
Ramya